Field photography representing Neanderthals
Chapter 08 · Human OriginsArchaeological Evidence

Neanderthals

400,000 – 40,000 years ago

Burial, pigment, and the genomic evidence for interbreeding with modern humans.

Chicago style · PDF or .txt
01 · How this chapter is built

Every claim in this period carries its evidence with it.

The evidence base

Skeletons, Mousterian tool assemblages, burials, pigment and shell use, and sequenced ancient genomes.

What the record carries
  • 01

    Neanderthals were a distinct population with their own long technological and cultural record across Europe and western Asia.

  • 02

    They interbred with modern humans: non-African genomes today carry Neanderthal ancestry.

  • 03

    They buried at least some of their dead and used pigment and ornament.

How we know

Each row states the method, what is actually measured, and — the part usually skipped — what the result does not settle.

MethodMaterialWhat it constrains
Ancient DNA sequencingBone and tooth powder, and sediment DNA from cave floorsEstablishes population relationships and admixture. Contamination control is the whole ballgame.
Radiocarbon with ultrafiltrationCollagen from bone near the limit of the methodImproved pretreatment pushed many 'late' dates older, revising overlap estimates with modern humans.
Uranium–thorium dating of carbonate crustsFlowstone over cave art and structuresGives a minimum age for what lies beneath the crust, not the act itself.
Where specialists disagree
  • How much symbolic behaviour is securely Neanderthal?

    Several claimed cases turn on whether the dated crust really postdates the mark.

  • Why did they disappear as a distinct population?

    Competition, climate, demography and absorption by admixture are all on the table.

Commonly misread
  • Neanderthals were brutish and cognitively limited.

    The archaeological record shows planning, composite technology, care of the injured and pigment use.

  • They were wiped out by modern humans.

    Their DNA persists in living people. Replacement and absorption are not the same event.

Still open
  • How large were their populations, and how fragmented?
  • How much of the assimilation happened where and when?
  • What did their language capacity actually look like?
Where to check us
  • Neanderthal genome project publications

    Nature / Science

  • Middle Palaeolithic site monographs

    Journal of Human Evolution