Analysis

Nimitz USS Tic Tac Encounter (2004)

The 2004 Nimitz Carrier Strike Group UFO/UAP incident, widely known as the "Tic Tac" encounter, involved multiple US Navy personnel observing an anomalous aerial vehicle off the coast of Southern California and Baja California during training exercises. The encounters occurred ov

By Erik Chambers

Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect

August 25, 2026· Updated August 26, 2026 5 min read· 1,163 words
In this articleThe Incident

Key Findings

  • The 2004 Nimitz Carrier Strike Group UFO/UAP incident, widely known as the "Tic Tac" encounter, involved multiple US Navy personnel observing an anomalous aerial vehicle off the coast of Southern California and Baja California during training exercises.
  • Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich provided public testimony describing their visual encounter on November 14, 2004.
  • speculated on various possibilities, ranging from advanced military prototypes to natural phenomena, based on the known information.

The 2004 Nimitz Carrier Strike Group UFO/UAP incident, widely known as the "Tic Tac" encounter, involved multiple US Navy personnel observing an anomalous aerial vehicle off the coast of Southern California and Baja California during training exercises. The encounters occurred over several days in late 2004.

November 10, 2004: The USS Princeton, a Ticonderoga-class cruiser, reportedly detected multiple unknown aerial contacts on its AN/SPY-1B radar system operating in the vicinity of the Southern California Offshore Range (SCORE) warning area. These contacts reportedly descended rapidly from over 80,000 feet to 20,000 feet and hovered before ascending.

November 14, 2004:

  • Approx. 11:00 AM PST: Two F/A-18F Super Hornet aircraft, assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41), were diverted from their training mission to investigate the radar contacts.
  • Approx. 11:10 AM PST: The Super Hornet aircrew, including Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich, made visual contact with an unknown object.
  • Approx. 11:15 AM PST: A second Super Hornet aircrew reportedly attempted to intercept the object, but it accelerated away.
  • Later that day: Another Super Hornet aircraft reportedly captured infrared video footage of the object.
  • Official US Navy records confirm the deployment of the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Southern California in November 2004 for a Joint Task Force Exercise (JTFEX).
  • The USS Princeton was operating as part of this strike group.
  • Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich were US Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet pilots operating with VFA-41 during this period.
  • The Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) video, known as the "FLIR1" video, depicting an unknown aerial object, was officially declassified and released by the Department of Defense in April 2020. This video was reportedly captured by a Super Hornet from VFA-41.
  • The Department of Defense established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) in August 2020, acknowledging that UAPs pose a potential security risk and confirming the reality of some UAP observations by military personnel. The Nimitz incident is among those reportedly studied by the UAPTF.
  • Personnel on the USS Princeton reportedly tracked multiple anomalous aerial contacts for several days, some described as dropping from high altitudes to sea level.
  • Commander Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Dietrich reportedly described the object they encountered as white, oblong, approximately 40 feet long, with no wings, rotors, or exhaust plumes, resembling a "Tic Tac" candy.
  • Witnesses stated the object exhibited erratic movements, rapid acceleration, and instantaneous changes in direction that defied known aerodynamic principles.
  • The object reportedly reappeared at a CAP (Combat Air Patrol) point 60 miles away within moments of the pilots engaging with it.
  • Another aircrew, reportedly flying a different Super Hornet, used their ATFLIR pod to record the "FLIR1" video sequence.
  • Crew members on the USS Nimitz and USS Princeton reportedly observed the object on various radar systems, including showing it hovering and performing extreme maneuvers.
  • Petty Officer 1st Class Kevin Day, an Operations Specialist on the USS Princeton, reportedly stated he tracked multiple UAP targets for several days before the visual encounters, describing them as highly advanced.

VERIFIED FACTS:

  • The "FLIR1" video, declassified and released by the Pentagon, shows an unknown object moving against the sky, exhibiting heat signatures. Its precise altitude and speed are not definitively stated within the officially released video itself, though pilots' verbal descriptions accompany its recording.

REPORTED CLAIMS:

  • The USS Princeton's AN/SPY-1B radar reportedly detected multiple contacts, some descending from 80,000 feet to 20,000 feet in seconds, then hovering or rapidly ascending. Operator statements include descriptions of the objects "dropping off radar" at high speeds.
  • Multiple other radar systems on the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group reportedly detected the objects, including the E-2C Hawkeye's airborne early warning radar and the AN/APS-145 radar.
  • F/A-18F Super Hornet radar systems reportedly locked onto the object, indicating real rather than phantom returns.

Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich provided public testimony describing their visual encounter on November 14, 2004. They both unequivocally stated they saw a solid, white, oblong object, approximately 40 feet in length, exhibiting extremely advanced flight characteristics. Other USS Nimitz personnel, including Kevin Day and Gary Voorhis, also provided public accounts of observing remarkable radar contacts and the anomalous object.

VERIFIED FACTS:

  • The Department of Defense did not publicly announce a dedicated, formal investigation into the Nimitz incident at the time it occurred.
  • The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), acknowledged in 2017 to have existed from 2007 to 2012, reportedly collected and analyzed UAP data, including potentially from the Nimitz incident.
  • The UAPTF was established in 2020 by the Department of Defense and subsequently replaced by the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) in 2021 and then the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) in 2022. These entities are mandated to investigate UAP incidents, including historical ones.

REPORTED CLAIMS:

  • Initial reports from the Nimitz incident were reportedly filed through official Navy channels, but no immediate public findings or conclusions were released. The incident reports were reportedly considered classified.

VERIFIED FACTS:

  • Publicly, no formal scientific body or U.S. government agency has released a definitive scientific explanation addressing the observed characteristics of the "Tic Tac" UAP in terms of known physics or aerospace technology.
  • AARO released a report in March 2023 that generally characterized UAP cases, including some historical ones, but offered no specific scientific conclusion on the Nimitz incident.

REPORTED CLAIMS:

  • Aerospace engineers and physicists have speculated on various possibilities, ranging from advanced military prototypes to natural phenomena, based on the known information. No consensus has emerged.

Skeptical explanations generally center on misidentification, radar anomalies, or psychological factors influencing witness perception. Some suggest the "Tic Tac" shape could be an artifact of an optical illusion or atmospheric conditions. Others propose it could be foreign experimental aircraft or debris, while acknowledging no nation has publicly demonstrated such capabilities. Radar issues, such as false positives or "ghost returns," are also frequently posited as contributing factors, particularly regarding distant or high-altitude contacts. However, the multi-sensor nature and multiple witness accounts of the Nimitz incidents make single-point failure explanations less comprehensive.

The core unexplained aspects of the Nimitz incident are the described aerodynamic capabilities of the "Tic Tac" object (instantaneous acceleration, hovering, and rapid changes in direction without visible means of propulsion), the multi-sensor detection across several platforms, and the apparent absence of any identifiable origin or purpose for the object. The identity and nature of the object(s) remain officially unconfirmed by the U.S. government.

The Nimitz "Tic Tac" incident features verified photographic/instrumental evidence (FLIR1 video) and contemporaneous, consistent accounts from multiple credible military personnel. While the precise nature and origin of the object remain unidentified, the documented records confirm the observation of anomalous aerial phenomena operating with capabilities beyond known conventional aircraft.

Built By

Editorial Operating System v1.0

Creator

Erik Chambers

Architecture

Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect

AI Assisted

No

Human Reviewed

Pending

Evidence Reviewed

In progress

Last Updated

August 26, 2026

Confidence

Evergreen high/10

Research Status

current

We do not claim perfection. We promise transparency. Every investigation shows its work — the question, the evidence, the tools, the humans, and the updates.

Analysis

Editorial Transparency

This article contains a combination of reporting, publicly available research, and editorial analysis.

Analysis and interpretation. Facts are sourced; conclusions are the author's. Evidence before opinion — facts require sources, analysis requires transparency, opinions require labels.

Meet the creator

Erik Chambers

Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect

Erik originated the central idea, directed the investigation, reviewed the evidence, and approved the final published work.

Read the founder profile →

Challenge This

We welcome disagreement

A different way to read the evidence. Research that points in another direction. Where specialists diverge.

Loading challenges…

Submit a challenge

Sign in to submit a challenge. All submissions are reviewed before appearing publicly.

Comments

Ask A Question

0

What would you ask an editor about this piece?

Reader questions feed our coverage map. The most-asked ones become our next investigations.

0/500

Continue Exploring

Guided by the evidence

Where should this take you next?

Part of a cluster

UAP Evidence

What does the documentary record actually support?

See the whole cluster
The Standard Score™

Nimitz USS Tic Tac Encounter (2004)

A composite 0–100 measure of how well this investigation meets the Second City Standard. Scores are auditable — every point comes from the criteria below.

Composite

of 100

Not yet scored

This investigation is queued for editorial scoring. No score has been assigned yet — the absence of a number is not a judgment on the evidence.

The Standard

· Editorial verdict

Based on the evidence presented,

Second City Standard believes The 2004 Nimitz Carrier Strike Group UFO/UAP incident, widely known as the "Tic Tac" encounter, involved multiple US Navy personnel observing an anomalous aerial vehicle off the coast of Southern California and Baja California during training exercises. The encounters occurred ov

Remaining uncertainty: Awaiting a final written verdict from the editorial desk.

The Standard · Second City Standard

Continue The Investigation

· Never a dead end
The 2ND Take

Signal over noise.

One weekly dispatch. The best of 2ND CITY STANDARD, straight to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

You Set The Standard

Do you agree with this investigation?

Cast your verdict, join the discussion, or share it forward. Second City Standard grows when readers challenge the evidence.

Discuss