Analysis

GIMBAL Navy Video (2015)

The "Gimbal" incident refers to a U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet FLIR (Forward Looking Infrared) video recording of an unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) encountered off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida, in January 2015. The video, depicting an object moving against the wind

By Erik Chambers

Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect

August 25, 2026· Updated August 26, 2026 5 min read· 1,054 words
In this articleThe Incident

Key Findings

  • The "Gimbal" video is an authentic, unclassified recording made by a U.S.
  • Personnel involved in the 2015 encounters off the USS Theodore Roosevelt's operations reportedly observed UAPs on "almost daily" occasions.
  • The "Gimbal" video itself is an infrared (FLIR) recording, which is an instrument reading.

The "Gimbal" incident refers to a U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet FLIR (Forward Looking Infrared) video recording of an unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) encountered off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida, in January 2015. The video, depicting an object moving against the wind while rotating, was subsequently released to the public, drawing significant attention to UAP observations by military personnel.

January 2015: U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet aircraft, operating from Naval Air Station Oceana embarked on the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, recorded the "Gimbal" video during training maneuvers off the eastern seaboard of the United States. March 2015: The "Gimbal" video was reportedly uploaded to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force (UAPTF) database. December 16, 2017: The New York Times published an article, "Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious UFO Program," which prominently featured the "Gimbal" video alongside the "Tic Tac" and "Go Fast" videos. This article also confirmed the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). September 19, 2019: The U.S. Navy officially acknowledged the videos, including "Gimbal," as authentic and unclassified, though they stated the phenomena depicted remained "unidentified." April 27, 2020: The Department of Defense (DoD) officially released the three previously acknowledged UAP videos, including "Gimbal," stating they were released "to clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real or whether or not there is more to the videos." June 25, 2021: The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a preliminary assessment on UAPs, which included references to the "Gimbal" type incidents, acknowledging 144 UAP reports predominantly from U.S. Navy personnel.

The "Gimbal" video is an authentic, unclassified recording made by a U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet aircraft. The video was recorded in January 2015 off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida. The Department of Defense officially released the video on April 27, 2020. The U.S. Navy confirmed the authenticity of the video in September 2019, stating that the objects in the video remain “unidentified.” The video displays a thermal signature of an airborne object.

Personnel involved in the 2015 encounters off the USS Theodore Roosevelt's operations reportedly observed UAPs on "almost daily" occasions. Pilots reportedly described the objects as capable of rapid acceleration, sudden stops, and impossible aerial maneuvers. Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich, one of the pilots involved in similar 2015 encounters, reportedly stated in a 2021 interview that the objects exhibited "apparent characteristics that are inexplicable." Another pilot, Lieutenant Ryan Graves, reportedly described the objects as having no visible exhaust plumes and no discernible flight surfaces, operating consistently for extended periods. The object in the "Gimbal" video is reportedly observed rotating while maintaining its direction of travel against strong winds. The pilots reportedly referred to these phenomena as "unexplained aerial phenomena" or "unknown aerial phenomena" prior to the formal adoption of "UAP."

The "Gimbal" video itself is an infrared (FLIR) recording, which is an instrument reading. There is no publicly released radar data specifically correlated with the "Gimbal" video. However, during the broader 2015 incidents, U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet aircraft, including those involved in the "Gimbal" recording, were equipped with advanced AN/APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars, which reportedly detected objects lacking traditional signatures of known aircraft.

Lieutenant Ryan Graves and other pilots involved in the 2015 encounters off the USS Theodore Roosevelt reportedly provided extensive testimony to the press and government officials. Graves reportedly described seeing objects that "accelerated to supersonic speeds... and couldn’t be accounted for." He also reportedly stated that the UAPs would remain on station for up to 11 hours, a capability far exceeding known aerial drones. Navy officials reportedly interviewed multiple witnesses concerning these events as part of ongoing investigations into UAP encounters.

The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), which ran from 2007 to 2012 with some residual activity until 2017, reportedly collected and analyzed UAP reports, including those from Navy personnel. The video was subsequently handled by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force (UAPTF), established by the DoD in August 2020, and its successor, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), established in July 2022. The ODNI’s Preliminary Assessment on UAPs (June 2021) included analysis of this type of incident, although it did not offer definitive explanations for all cases.

Official scientific analysis released to the public has been limited. The object's thermal signature in the "Gimbal" video is consistent with an airborne metallic object, but lacks sufficient resolution to identify specific features. Academic physicists and aerospace engineers have offered independent, non-official analyses. Some suggest optical artifacts or atmospheric conditions might explain the apparent rotation and movement. Others point to the reported maneuverability and lack of visible propulsion as scientifically anomalous. The term "gimbal" itself refers to the apparent rotation of the object, which is debated as either actual rotation or an artifact of the FLIR tracking system’s stabilization attempting to center the object.

Skeptical explanations for the "Gimbal" video typically focus on sensor artifacts and pilot misinterpretation. It has been proposed that the "rotation" observed is an optical illusion created by the FLIR camera's gimballing mechanism itself, which applies an angular roll to the image when tracking. The object's seemingly anomalous movement could be attributed to parallax, atmospheric inversions, or a distant conventional aircraft or drone whose true scale and speed are difficult to ascertain without more data. The 'flaring' seen in the video, characteristic of thermal blooming, can obscure definitive shape or features.

The exact nature of the object in the "Gimbal" video remains officially undetermined. Without additional sensor data—such as radar tracks, electro-optical imagery, or eyewitness accounts directly correlated with the video—the object’s identity, propulsion method, and reported maneuvers (including its ability to seemingly operate against strong headwinds while rotating) remain unexplained within the framework of known conventional or classified aircraft.

The "Gimbal" video is a verified recording of an unidentified aerial phenomenon observed by U.S. Navy pilots. While the video is authentic, the nature of the object and the full context of its observed behavior, particularly its reported extraordinary maneuvers, remain officially unexplained due to limited publicly available data and definitive analysis.

Built By

Editorial Operating System v1.0

Creator

Erik Chambers

Architecture

Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect

AI Assisted

No

Human Reviewed

Pending

Evidence Reviewed

In progress

Last Updated

August 26, 2026

Confidence

Evergreen high/10

Research Status

current

We do not claim perfection. We promise transparency. Every investigation shows its work — the question, the evidence, the tools, the humans, and the updates.

Analysis

Editorial Transparency

This article contains a combination of reporting, publicly available research, and editorial analysis.

Analysis and interpretation. Facts are sourced; conclusions are the author's. Evidence before opinion — facts require sources, analysis requires transparency, opinions require labels.

Meet the creator

Erik Chambers

Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect

Erik originated the central idea, directed the investigation, reviewed the evidence, and approved the final published work.

Read the founder profile →

Challenge This

We welcome disagreement

A different way to read the evidence. Research that points in another direction. Where specialists diverge.

Loading challenges…

Submit a challenge

Sign in to submit a challenge. All submissions are reviewed before appearing publicly.

Comments

Ask A Question

0

What would you ask an editor about this piece?

Reader questions feed our coverage map. The most-asked ones become our next investigations.

0/500

Continue Exploring

Guided by the evidence

Where should this take you next?

Part of a cluster

Baseball Value

What is a baseball player actually worth, and who decides?

See the whole cluster
The Standard Score™

GIMBAL Navy Video (2015)

A composite 0–100 measure of how well this investigation meets the Second City Standard. Scores are auditable — every point comes from the criteria below.

Composite

of 100

Not yet scored

This investigation is queued for editorial scoring. No score has been assigned yet — the absence of a number is not a judgment on the evidence.

The Standard

· Editorial verdict

Based on the evidence presented,

Second City Standard believes The "Gimbal" incident refers to a U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet FLIR (Forward Looking Infrared) video recording of an unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) encountered off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida, in January 2015. The video, depicting an object moving against the wind

Remaining uncertainty: Awaiting a final written verdict from the editorial desk.

The Standard · Second City Standard

Continue The Investigation

· Never a dead end
The 2ND Take

Signal over noise.

One weekly dispatch. The best of 2ND CITY STANDARD, straight to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

You Set The Standard

Do you agree with this investigation?

Cast your verdict, join the discussion, or share it forward. Second City Standard grows when readers challenge the evidence.

Discuss