AATIP Program Disclosure (2017)
The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) gained public notoriety in December 2017 following a series of articles in *The New York Times* and *Politico*. These reports detailed the existence of a clandestine U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) program that investi
By Erik Chambers
Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect
In this articleThe Incident
Key Findings
- The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) gained public notoriety in December 2017 following a series of articles in The New York Times and Politico.
- Despite official acknowledgments and the release of video evidence, the specific nature of the objects depicted in the "FLIR1," "GIMBAL," and "GOFAST" videos remains officially unidentified by the U.S.
- The official disclosures surrounding AATIP confirm extensive government interest and investigation into unidentified aerial phenomena.
The Incident
The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) gained public notoriety in December 2017 following a series of articles in The New York Times and Politico. These reports detailed the existence of a clandestine U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) program that investigated unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and included the public release of several unclassified videos depicting encounters with UAP by U.S. Navy aviators.
Timeline of Events
- 2007: The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) is established within the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) with a reported annual budget of $22 million.
- 2009: Harry Reid, then Senate Majority Leader, reportedly secures funding for AATIP.
- Late 2011/Early 2012: AATIP's direct funding reportedly ends, though activities are stated to have continued.
- Late 2017: Luis Elizondo, former head of AATIP, reportedly resigns from the DoD.
- December 16, 2017: The New York Times publishes "Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’: The Pentagon’s Mysterious U.F.O. Program," revealing AATIP's existence and releasing "FLIR1," "GIMBAL," and "GOFAST" UAP videos. Politico simultaneously publishes "The Pentagon’s Secret Search for UFOs."
- December 18, 2017: The DoD officially confirms the existence of AATIP.
- May 14, 2019: The U.S. Navy confirms the authenticity of the "FLIR1," "GIMBAL," and "GOFAST" videos, but clarifies they are "unclassified footage of unidentified aerial phenomena" and were not authorized for public release.
- April 27, 2020: The DoD officially declassifies and releases the three videos, stating they were released "in order to clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real or whether or not there is more to the videos."
- July 23, 2020: The DoD establishes the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) as successor to AATIP.
- June 25, 2021: The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) releases a preliminary assessment on UAPs, based on UAPTF data.
Verified Facts
- The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) confirmed the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) in December 2017.
- The DoD officially declassified and released the "FLIR1" (known as "GIMBAL" in the DoD release), "GIMBAL" (known as "FLIR1" in the DoD release), and "GOFAST" videos on April 27, 2020, acknowledging them as "unclassified videos depicting unidentified aerial phenomena."
- The U.S. Navy confirmed the authenticity of these videos in May 2019.
- Senator Harry Reid explicitly acknowledged his role in securing funding for AATIP in December 2017.
- AATIP was funded from 2007 to late 2011/early 2012.
- The DoD established the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) in July 2020.
- The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a preliminary assessment of UAPs in June 2021, derived from UAPTF data.
Reported Claims
- Luis Elizondo, the former head of AATIP, reportedly stated that the program's mission was to investigate "anomalous aerospace threats."
- Elizondo reportedly claims that while AATIP’s direct funding officially ended, the program continued under different arrangements within the DoD.
- Reports from The New York Times and Politico stated that AATIP collected "reams of data, including videos of encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena, sometimes exhibiting capabilities beyond the next generation of American aircraft."
- Various individuals, including former members of the program, have reportedly claimed that some UAP encountered demonstrated "advanced aerodynamic characteristics."
Radar & Instrument Evidence
- The "FLIR1," "GIMBAL," and "GOFAST" videos show UAP detected by advanced targeting pods (e.g., ATFLIR, AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR pods) aboard U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet aircraft. These pods utilize infrared cameras and other sensors.
- In the "GIMBAL" video, the object is shown rotating against the wind, with pilots reportedly expressing confusion over its flight characteristics.
- The "GOFAST" video captures an object moving rapidly over water.
- The "FLIR1" video (often associated with the Nimitz incident) shows an object accelerating rapidly out of frame after being tracked by an ATFLIR pod.
- According to a U.S. Navy investigation report on the 2004 Nimitz encounter, radar operators on the USS Princeton reportedly detected multiple anomalous airborne contacts travelling at "hypersonic speeds" and changing direction almost instantaneously.
Witness Testimony
- According to The New York Times, several former U.S. Navy pilots, including Cmdr. David Fravor and Lt. Cmdr. Chad Underwood, publicly described their encounters with UAP during the 2004 Nimitz carrier strike group incident.
- Fravor reportedly described seeing a "Tic Tac"-shaped object, approximately 40 feet long, that outmaneuvered his F/A-18 and rapidly ascended.
- Underwood reportedly described the object's appearance on radar as "like a little flickering blob."
- Witnesses within AATIP reportedly contributed to internal reports detailing UAP characteristics, such as "anti-gravity propulsion" and "transmedium travel."
Official Investigations
- The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) itself was an official, albeit covert, U.S. government initiative to investigate UAP from 2007-2012 (with reported follow-on activities).
- The U.S. Navy initiated formal policies in 2019 for reporting UAP sightings, confirming their seriousness about the phenomena.
- The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF), established by the DoD in 2020, is an official investigative body.
- The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) conducted an official preliminary assessment of UAPs in June 2021, based on UAPTF data.
Scientific Analysis
- Independent scientific analysis of the released videos has primarily focused on attempting to identify mundane explanations for the observed phenomena, such as sensor artifacts, optical illusions, or conventional aircraft.
- Some analyses suggest the "GIMBAL" video object could be a distant, out-of-focus aircraft.
- The "GOFAST" video has been interpreted by some as a bird or other small object exhibiting parallax effect against cloud cover.
- Conversely, some analysts argue that the reported speeds and maneuvers, particularly in the Nimitz incident, still challenge conventional aerodynamic explanations for known aircraft.
Skeptical Explanations
- Many skeptical explanations for the phenomena captured in the released videos center on misidentification, sensor glitches, and human perceptual errors.
- It has been suggested that the "GIMBAL" object's rotation could be an artifact of the targeting pod's gimbal system or the angular rotation of a distant aircraft.
- The rapid movement in "GOFAST" has been partly attributed to the relative motion between the jet and the object, combined with the target's small apparent size and background.
- Some critics have pointed out that the videos are short, lack crucial context, and are subject to various interpretations.
- Regarding the AATIP program, some argue it was primarily an intelligence-gathering exercise focused on foreign adversary technologies, rather than an explicit search for extraterrestrial craft.
What Remains Unexplained
Despite official acknowledgments and the release of video evidence, the specific nature of the objects depicted in the "FLIR1," "GIMBAL," and "GOFAST" videos remains officially unidentified by the U.S. government. Furthermore, the full scope of AATIP's findings, and the extent to which reported UAP capabilities (e.g., "transmedium travel," "anti-gravity propulsion") were substantiated within the program, has not been publicly disclosed. Explanations capable of accounting for the multi-sensor, multi-witness accounts from incidents like the 2004 Nimitz encounter, particularly the reported extreme speeds and anomalous flight characteristics, are still lacking official consensus.
The Standard
The official disclosures surrounding AATIP confirm extensive government interest and investigation into unidentified aerial phenomena. While the authenticity of the released videos is verified, the specific identity and nature of the objects captured within them remain officially undetermined by the U.S. government.
Built By
Editorial Operating System v1.0Creator
Erik Chambers
Architecture
Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect
AI Assisted
No
Human Reviewed
Pending
Evidence Reviewed
In progress
Last Updated
August 26, 2026
Confidence
Evergreen high/10
Research Status
current
We do not claim perfection. We promise transparency. Every investigation shows its work — the question, the evidence, the tools, the humans, and the updates.
Editorial Transparency
This article contains a combination of reporting, publicly available research, and editorial analysis.
Analysis and interpretation. Facts are sourced; conclusions are the author's. Evidence before opinion — facts require sources, analysis requires transparency, opinions require labels.
Meet the creator
Erik Chambers
Founder, Creator & Editorial Architect
Erik originated the central idea, directed the investigation, reviewed the evidence, and approved the final published work.
Read the founder profile →Challenge This
We welcome disagreement
A different way to read the evidence. Research that points in another direction. Where specialists diverge.
Loading challenges…
Submit a challenge
Sign in to submit a challenge. All submissions are reviewed before appearing publicly.
Comments
Ask A Question
What would you ask an editor about this piece?
Reader questions feed our coverage map. The most-asked ones become our next investigations.
Continue Exploring
Guided by the evidenceWhere should this take you next?
Part of a cluster
UAP Evidence
What does the documentary record actually support?
See the whole clusterAATIP Program Disclosure (2017)
A composite 0–100 measure of how well this investigation meets the Second City Standard. Scores are auditable — every point comes from the criteria below.
Composite
—
of 100
This investigation is queued for editorial scoring. No score has been assigned yet — the absence of a number is not a judgment on the evidence.
The Standard
· Editorial verdictBased on the evidence presented,
Second City Standard believes The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) gained public notoriety in December 2017 following a series of articles in *The New York Times* and *Politico*. These reports detailed the existence of a clandestine U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) program that investi
Remaining uncertainty: Awaiting a final written verdict from the editorial desk.
The Standard · Second City Standard
Continue The Investigation
· Never a dead endThis investigation is one thread. Pull the next one — every path below is another investigation, another question, or another discipline applied to the same problem.
Signal over noise.
One weekly dispatch. The best of 2ND CITY STANDARD, straight to your inbox.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.