Evidence Field Log
Score a case the way the desk does. Witness quality, sensors, documentary record, and remaining gaps are weighted separately so a vivid story cannot outrun a thin file.
Inputs
0 none · 3 trained multi-witness · 5 independent experts, contemporaneous.
Radar, video, telemetry, medical, physical trace. 0 = testimony only.
Official reports, timestamps, chain of custody, contemporaneous notes.
0 closed file · 5 decisive missing pieces. Gaps subtract.
Aircraft, weather balloon, Venus, drones, advertised launches. More checks completed raises the file, not the mystery.
Conventional hypothesis
Result
A
Publishable as documented, high confidence
- Score / 100
- 100
- Confidence
- High
- Sensor share
- 34%
- Gap penalty
- −20
12·3 + 22·2 + 16·3 − 10·2 + 3·2 + 0 = 100
Download
Methodology
Four piles, kept separate, plus a conventional-check count. Testimony can raise a case; it cannot carry one. Sensor and documentary weight more than witnesses. Gaps and a live conventional explanation pull the grade down. Unidentified is not extraterrestrial.
score = clamp(12·W + 22·S + 16·D − 10·G + 3·checks + mod, 0, 100) mod = −18 strong conventional | 0 open | +8 conventional fails A ≥ 85 · B ≥ 70 · C ≥ 55 · D ≥ 40 · else F
Limits A high grade means the file is strong enough to publish as documented. It does not mean aliens, hoax, or any other conclusion. This is not a live sighting map and it does not store reports on a server. Interpretation stays in the article. The widget only scores the record you typed.