Everything we have published
Filter by what a story is — an investigation, an analysis, or a brief — and by what it is about.
10 stories
A championship determines a winner. Evaluating money, management and pressure requires a different test—and evidence beyond the final out.
Leadership deserves scrutiny beyond the manager’s office, but research on coordination and player support is not a license to invent a winning-culture score.
A championship is not guaranteed by spending. That does not make financial advantage imaginary—or make low spending a competitive virtue.
Chicago’s championship teams offer a better argument than imaginary standings: money and organizational judgment belong in the same conversation, not opposite corners.
Research on MLB audiences supports a serious pressure discussion, but its star-batter finding complicates the story about highly paid players choking.
Payroll can improve a baseball team’s prospects without guaranteeing October baseball—or a championship once it gets there.
MLB's published payroll-ranking table shows a substantial regular-season divide. Understanding what that average can—and cannot—tell us is the real story.
The reported spending contrast is striking, but an honest comparison needs consistent accounting and evidence about how each roster produced its results.
The useful argument is not money against competence, but whether a front office turns its resources into a roster that can survive its weaknesses.
Summed player value tracks a season's standings closely in aggregate and misses individual clubs by several games. The gap is the interesting part.